Structured dictionary

ABSTRACT

A dictionary data structure is described. The data structure is made up of first, second, and third tables. The first table is comprised of entries each representing a natural language term, each entry of the first table containing a term ID identifying its term. The second table is comprised of entries each representing a definition, each entry of the second containing a definition ID identifying its definition. The third table is comprised of entries each representing correspondence between a terminate definition defining the term, each entry of the third table containing term ID identifying the defined term and a definition ID identifying the defining definition. The contents of the data structure are usable to identify any definitions corresponding to a term.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/404,916, filed on Jan. 12, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/963,063 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,575,954), filed on Dec. 8, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/150,237, filed on Apr. 20, 2015, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

The present application is related to the following applications, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/722,759 filed on Nov. 5, 2012; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/723,018 filed Dec. 20, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,009,197.

In ways in which the present application and documents incorporated herein by reference are inconsistent, the present applications controls.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The described technology is directed to the fields of natural language processing and analysis.

BACKGROUND

Many fields of business are subject to extensive, complex bodies of regulations. As one example, the field of Information Technology is subject to myriad international and local laws, administrative rules and guidelines, standards, and other forms of regulation relating to data security and privacy, export control, data formats, identity authentication and authorization of people and machines, among other subjects.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the components typically incorporated in at least some of the computer systems and other devices on which the facility operates.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing steps performed by the facility in some embodiments to maintain the dictionary.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing steps performed by the facility in some embodiments to maintain the dictionary.

FIG. 4 is a data structure diagram showing a graph showing sample relationships between terms in the dictionary.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The inventors have observed that is difficult and expensive to comply with extensive, complex bodies of regulations, and have recognized that automated governance tools for ensuring compliance with such regulations would have significant utility.

A body of regulations in a particular field of business is very often the collective product of a large number of documents—statutes, treaties, administrative rules, industry standards—referred to herein as authority documents. Each such authority document can impose its own requirements. Content of certain authority documents can affect the meaning of other authority documents. The inventors recognized that an effective automated governance tool is much more likely to be effective if it based on a coordinated understanding of all of the authority documents and how they fit together.

The inventors further recognized that manually establishing such a coordinated understanding of all of the authority documents and how they fit together can itself be an incredibly difficult and expensive task—especially where the set of authority documents is continuously evolving—and that conventional tools for generating an understanding of arbitrary text are ill-suited to derive a complete and accurate understanding of requirements established across a large number of authority documents. In particular, they found such conventional tools as Part of Speech Taggers, Named Entity Taggers, and Natural Language Processors to operate in too general and casual a way, often relying on static, general-purpose dictionaries that intersect inadequately with the linguistic domains of many sets of authority documents; that lack kinds of information needed to do a good job of understanding these authority documents and discerning the requirements they impose; and that often contain information from other domains that tends to confound the process of understanding the authority documents in their own domain. In particular, the dictionaries used by such tools typically fail to capture many kinds of useful information about and relationships between words, including words that are alternate versions of one another, and words that are Named Entities.

Accordingly, the inventors have conceived and reduced to practice a type of dictionary for use in understanding documents imposing requirements (“the dictionary”), and a software and/or hardware facility for constructing, maintaining, and applying such a dictionary (“the facility”). The dictionary is designed to manage multiple definitions for each term it defines, and recognize and resolve ambiguities in the spelling and/or phrasing of defined terms. The dictionary represents complex hierarchies of terms, based on both directional and bidirectional relationships of various types between terms.

In various embodiments, the dictionary supports identification of named entities, such as by Named Entity (NE) engines; identification of parts of speech, parts of speech (POS) taggers; and text parsing, including sense disambiguation, such as by Natural Language Processing (NLP) engines. These, in turn, assist in the process of mapping “citations”—each a portion of an authority document—each to one of a set of harmonized controls that are the basis for compliance efforts and compliance certification.

Named Entities are definite noun phrases that refer to specific types of individuals, such as organizations, persons, dates, and so on, and are often used by Natural Language Processing engines. Named Entities can be used to determine the difference between “contract” and “contracts,” (beyond the plurality of the second): tying the definition of the first to the Named Entity of a particular record example and the definition of the second other to the named entity of an entire record category makes it clear that the first refers to a particular contract, while the second refers to all contracts.

When tagging a sentence and adding Named Entity recognition to the sentence, this way of curating meaning aids in teaching the Natural Language Processing engine how and in what part of the sentence, terms are most often used. It can change the difference in correct recognition from 60% to 70%, for example.

Within compliance frameworks such as the UNIFIED COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK, Named Entity recognition allows a mapper to see which pieces of evidence are necessary to carry out a control. By tagging terms as record example or asset, governance risk and compliance tools can then parse out which evidence needs to be supported for which controls.

Parts of Speech taggers are similar to Named Entity engines and focus on parts of speech beyond nouns, such as verbs, pronouns, adjectives and adverbs, and are extensible and trainable whereas NE engines generally are not.

The dictionary tracks usage of terms and their curated tagging to send that information to the Natural Language Processor, showing that 90% of the time when a sentence starts with “report” it doesn't mean the loud bang of a gun or explosion.

Beyond simple Parts of Speech tagging, complex Parts of Speech tagging coupled with Named Entity recognition significantly assists the Natural Language Processor. As an example, a Named Entity taggers tagging the word “audit” as a Named Entity task in the same sentence as the word “computer” tells the Natural Language Processor that there's a high degree of probability the next time it sees the two together that the word “audit” doesn't mean to informally attend a class of some type, but rather corresponds to this Named Entity.

Natural Language Processors in their native form tend to accurately process sentences at a rate of 60%; when combined with the NE and POS engines and curated content described herein, their sentence-processing accuracy reaches approximately 85%. In order to be taught, they must be enhanced with curated content and a dictionary structure that allows them to scan the structure and curated content and add new heuristic rules as they go. They can learn, but they have to learn in a structured manner. The dictionary is well-suited to do this.

In some embodiments, the facility tracks, for each term, the frequency with which it occurs in each of one or more different corpuses of documents, and/or in each of one or more different types of document corpuses. In some embodiments, the facility tracks, for each definition of a term, the frequency with which the facility selects the definition for occurrences of the term in each of one or more different corpuses of documents, and/or in each of one or more different types of document corpuses.

In some embodiments, the facility tracks and maps non-standard terms, and harmonized terms. In particular, among a set of two or more similar terms having the same meaning, the facility identifies a harmonized term as being preferred for usage.

In some embodiments, the dictionary is organized as follows:

Term names are stored in A dictionary_terms table. Definitions are stored in A dictionary_definitions table. A term in the dictionary_terms table is connected to each definition of the term in the dictionary_definitions table through a dictionary_terms_to_dictionary_definitions table.

A list of word types, such as noun, verb, adjective, etc. or any specific named entity (also called “UCF elements”) related to auditing Record Example, Triggering event, etc. are stored in a dictionary_word_types table, which is connected directly to the dictionary_definitions table.

Plurals, possessives, plural possessives, pasts, past participles, and all other conjugations of words are stored in a dictionary_other_forms table, which is linked to the corresponding term in the dictionary_terms table.

The types of possible other forms are stored in a dictionary_other_form_types table. The dictionary_other_form_types table is connected directly to the dictionary_other_forms table.

Acronyms for term names are stored in an acronym table. The dictionary_terms table is connected to the acronym table through a dictionary_terms_to_acronyms table.

Synonyms and Antonyms are stored in the dictionary_terms_same_level table. The dictionary_terms_same_level table is connected directly to the dictionary_terms table. Each record of the dictionary_terms_same_level table connects 2 rows of the dictionary_terms table as synonyms or antonyms. All other relationships between terms are stored in the dictionary_terms_hierarchy table, which is connected directly to the dictionary_terms table.

A blacklisted_linguistic_relationship_terms table contains term names that excluded from the automatic parent/child relationships we suggest for our term hierarchy mostly smaller common words like “a”, “the”, etc. The blacklisted_linguistic_relationship_terms table is connected directly to the dictionary_terms table.

In some embodiments, the facility performs natural language parser training using sentence data, including sentence data contained in tables such as a sentence table, a tagged phrase table, a sentence dependencies table, etc.

By operating in some or all of the ways described above, the facility supports accurate automatic understanding of authority documents as a basis for discerning a set of coordinated requirements from the authority documents.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the components typically incorporated in at least some of the computer systems and other devices on which the facility operates. In various embodiments, these computer systems and other devices 100 can include server computer systems, desktop computer systems, laptop computer systems, netbooks, mobile phones, personal digital assistants, televisions, cameras, automobile computers, electronic media players, etc. In various embodiments, the computer systems and devices include zero or more of each of the following: a central processing unit (“CPU”) 101 for executing computer programs; a computer memory 102 for storing programs and data while they are being used, including the facility and associated data, an operating system including a kernel, and device drivers; a persistent storage device 103, such as a hard drive or flash drive for persistently storing programs and data; a computer-readable media drive 104, such as a floppy, CD-ROM, or DVD drive, for reading programs and data stored on a computer-readable medium; and a network connection 105 for connecting the computer system to other computer systems to send and/or receive data, such as via the Internet or another network and its networking hardware, such as switches, routers, repeaters, electrical cables and optical fibers, light emitters and receivers, radio transmitters and receivers, and the like. While computer systems configured as described above are typically used to support the operation of the facility, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the facility may be implemented using devices of various types and configurations, and having various components.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing steps performed by the facility in some embodiments to maintain the dictionary. In step 201, the facility compiles the dictionary based upon observations from authority documents in the subject-matter domain of the body of regulations to be understood. In some embodiments, after step 201, the facility repeats step 201 to continue compiling the dictionary.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the steps shown in FIG. 2 and in each of the flow diagrams discussed below may be altered in a variety of ways. For example, the order of the steps may be rearranged; some steps may be performed in parallel; shown steps may be omitted, or other steps may be included; a shown step may be divided into substeps, or multiple shown steps may be combined into a single step, etc.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing steps performed by the facility in some embodiments to maintain the dictionary. In step 301, the facility applies the dictionary compiled by the facility in accordance with FIG. 2 and performing a variety of kinds of processing of authority documents in the corresponding domain: part-of-speech tagging, named entity tagging, sense disambiguation, and parsing. In some embodiments, after step 301, the facility repeats step 301 to continue applying the dictionary to additional and/or revised authority documents.

In some embodiments, the facility characterizes dictionary terms using parts of speech such as the following: Noun, Verb, Adjective, Adverb, Preposition, Conjunction, Pronoun, Interjection, Prefix, Combining form, Abbreviation, Contraction, Adjective suffix, Article, Verb suffix, Noun suffix, Phrase, Asset, cDoc, Configurable Item, Data Contents, Metric, Organizational, Function, Organizational Task, Record Category, Record Example, Role Definition, Title, Configuration Setting, Organization, Authority Document, Limiting Term, Group, Triggering Event.

In some embodiments, the facility establishes relationships between terms and the dictionary using a rich selection of relationship types, such as the following: Is Part of, Contains, Is a Type of, Is a Category for, Is Used to Create/Is Created by, Is Used to Enforce/Is Enforced by, References/Is Referenced by. In some embodiments, the facility further stores in the dictionary a reason for establishing at least some of its relationships between terms.

For example, in some embodiments, the facility establishes relationships of types such as the following: X Is Part of Y, X Contains Y (which shows Y is a part of X), X Is a Type of Y, X Is a Category for Y (which shows Y is a type of X), X Is Used to Create Y, X Is Created by Y (which shows Y is used to create X), X Is Used to Enforce Y, X Is Enforced by Y (which shows Y is used to enforce X), X References Y, X Is Referenced by Y (which shows Y references X).

FIG. 4 is a data structure diagram showing a graph showing sample relationships between terms in the dictionary. For example, can be seen that Framework 401 and Measures 402 are related in that Framework 401 contains Measures 402. As another example, Measures 402 are used to enforce both Guidelines 403 and Standards 404.

The following table shows, for each term shown in FIG. 4, how the terms relate in the hierarchy established by the dictionary.

Reference Element Number Term Description Example Type 401 Framework The overall documented “An organization's physical cDoc structure and template that the security framework organization can use to create provides a systematic and maintain something (It approach to create an defines the scope, objectives, physical security plans, activities, and structure) policies, and procedures.” 402 Measures Are used to enforce “The organization can noun guidelines create and implement a and standards. security awareness training program as a measure to enforce industry standards regarding physical security.” 403 Guideline A documented 1. “The organization could Record recommendation of how follow an industry guideline Example an organization should do on physical security to something, (Inspiration for create an their policies, Programs, policies, etc.) procedures, plans, etc. 2. A large organization could write an internal physical security guideline for each of their facilities to interpret for the creation and implementation of their policies, procedures, plans. etc.” 404 Standard A documented goal or ideal 1. Army Regulation 380-19: Record an organization uses to “Information Systems Example determine their compliance Security defines how a with something. computer room should be set up to decrease the risk of fire and protect against unauthorized access. 2. A large organization could write an internal physical security standard that defines how two-factor authentication techniques should be implemented.” 405 Program A documented listing of “An organization could Record procedures, schedules, roles create a security Example and responsibilities, and awareness and training plans/instructions to be program to educate performed to personnel on the proper complete/implement procedures and who to something. report issues to.” 406 Methodology Business strategy of how 1. “The organization could noun to approach something. choose to use two-factor (how to we approach authentication to restrict creating a framework, access to organizational policy, etc.) facilities. This methodology enhances security by making unauthorized access more difficult. 2. The organization could choose to adopt the principle of least privilege. This methodology would result in procedures such as giving personnel access only to facilities they require to perform their job.” 407, 411 Technique The use of a specific “An organization could noun technology or procedure choose to use a biometric to achieve something in authentication technique, alignment with the such as fingerprint readers, organization's methodologies. as part of their two-factor (usually when there are authentication multiple paths for an methodology.” Organization to take) 408 Plan A step-by-step outline of the “An organization's fire Record processes and procedures to safety plan outlines the Example be performed to complete or procedures personnel implement something. should perform in the event of a fire.” 409 Policy The business rules and “An organization's physical Record guidelines of the organization security policy contains Example that ensure consistency and the considerations an compliance with something, organization must take into account when creating procedures for handling and securing IT assets and securing facilities that house IT assets from unauthorized entries and environmental disasters.” 410 Procedure A detailed description of the “An organization's physical Record steps necessary to implement security procedure defines Example or perform something in the processes the conformance with applicable organization uses to restrict standards. A procedure is access to its facilities, such written to ensure something is how visitors are handled, implemented or performed in how security badges are the same manner in order to distributed, etc. ” obtain the same results. 412 Process Activities performed while “The actions performed noun following the documented while giving visitors access procedures to organizational facilities in accordance with the organization's defined visitor access procedure.”

In some embodiments, the dictionary is comprised of the following interconnected tables:

dictionary_terms (DI): This table is where dictionary term names are stored.

Properties

Field Description DI_id The unique identification number assigned to each term name upon its creation. DI_live_status Indicates whether the term is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live DI_deprecated_by The DI_id of the term name record that supersedes a deprecated term name record. Only used when a term name is deprecated. DI_deprecation_notes The reason for deprecating a term name such as, “Duplicate”, “Does not meet quality standards”, “Remapped”, etc. Only used when a term name is deprecated. DI_date_added The date the term name was created. DI_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DI_language The language the content is in. DI_name The term name connecting to the term name ID. DI_description Contains: nonstandard forms under the “Alternate Spellings” heading; Broader Terms (type of, part of, and linguistic child of); Synonyms and Antonyms; Definitions (just the definition text, not the word type). This field is not used internally; it exists for the XML specification that uses a single field for a glossary term's definition. i_DI_harmonized_to_id Only used when a term is nonstandard, this is the ID of the standard term. i_DI_stripped_name This is the name of the term with all spaces, punctuation, accent marks, etc. removed. Its used for searching in certain cases.

referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS_TO_DICTIONARY_DEFINITIONS     -   DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORMS     -   DICTIONARY_TERMS_TO_ACRONYMS     -   DICTIONARY_TERMS_SAME_LEVEL     -   DICTIONARY_TERMS_HIERARCHY     -   BLACKLISTED_LINGUISTIC_RELATIONSHIP_TERMS         dictionary_definitions (DD): This table is where dictionary         definitions are stored.

Properties

Field description DD_id The unique identification number assigned to each definition upon its creation. DD_live_status Indicates whether the definition is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live DD_deprecated_by The DD_id of the definition record that supersedes a deprecated definition record. Only used when a dictionary definition is deprecated. DD_deprecation_notes The reason for deprecating a definition such as, “Duplicate”, “Does not meet quality standards”, “Remapped”, etc. Only used when a definition is deprecated. DD_date_added The date the definition was created. DD_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DD_definition The definition connecting to the definition id. WT_id The id of the word type connecting to the definition entry. DOF_id The id of the other forms connecting to the definition entry.

referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS_TO_DICTIONARY_DEFINITIONS     -   DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORMS     -   DICTIONARY_WORD_TYPES         dictionary_terms_to_dictionary_definitions (DI_to_DD): This         table connects dictionary term names to definitions. The ids of         both the dictionary term (DI_ID) and the dictionary definition         (DD_ID) are stored in this table.

Properties

Field description DI_to_DD_id The unique identification number assigned to each term name to definition relationship upon its creation. DI_to_DD_live_status Indicates whether the term name to definition relationship is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live DI_to_DD_date_added The date the term name to definition relationship was created. DI_to_DD_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DI_id The id of the dictionary term name connecting to the definition. DD_id The id of the definition connecting to the term name.

referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS     -   DICTIONARY_DEFINITIONS         dictionary_word_types (WT): This table stores word types parts         of speech and UCF named entities (elements).

Properties

Field description WT_id The unique identification number assigned to each word type. WT_name The unique name of word type that correlates with the id. WT_live_status Indicates whether the word type is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live. WT_date_added The date the word type entry was created. WT_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. WT_base_type The word type a subset word type should behave as. For example Assets are a special kind of Noun, so they have a base type of 1, which is the ID for the Noun type. This field is used for NLP tagging to determine which other forms workflow to use in our OMT (Online Mapping Tool).

Referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORM_TYPES     -   DICTIONARY_DEFINITIONS         -   Each definition has a word type which is stored in the WT_ID             field in the DICTIONARY_DEFINITIONS table.

WT_id WT_name 1 Noun 2 Verb 3 Adjective 4 Adverb 5 Preposition 6 Conjunction 7 Pronoun 8 Interjection 9 Prefix 10 Combining form 11 Abbreviation 12 Contraction 13 Adjective suffix 14 Article 15 Verb suffix 16 Noun suffix 17 Phrase 19 Asset 20 cDoc 21 Configurable Item 22 Data Contents 24 Metric 26 Organizational Function 27 Organizational Task 28 Record Category 29 Record Example 30 Role Definition 31 Title 32 Configuration Setting 33 Organization 34 Authority Document 35 Limiting Term 36 Group 37 Triggering Event In some embodiments, “Metric” shown above is omitted from the word types used by the facility. dictionary_other_forms (DOF): This table stores other forms of terms such as plural, possessive, plural possessive, past, past participle, present participle, third person, future tense, plural past, plural past participle, plural present participle, and plural future tense.

Properties

Field description DOF_id The unique identification number assigned to each other form upon its creation. DOF_name The unique name of other form that correlates with the id. DOF_live_status Indicates whether the other form is live or not: 1 = live, 0 = not live. DOF_date_added The date the dictionary other form entry was created. DOF_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DOF_is_irregular Indicates whether the other form is irregular: 1 = irregular, 0 = regular. OFT_id The id of the other form type connecting to dictionary other form entry. DI_id The id of the term name connecting to the dictionary other form entry.

Referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS     -   DICTIONARY_DEFINITIONS     -   DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORM_TYPES         dictionary_other_form_types (OFT): This table stores all         possible types of other forms.

Properties

Field description OFT_id The unique identification number assigned to each other form type. OFT_name The name of the other form type. OFT_live_status Indicates whether the other form type is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live. OFT_date_added The date the other form type was created. OFT_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. WT_id The word type connecting to the other form type. OFT_ID OFT_NAME   1 Plural   2 Past   3 Third Person   4 Present Participle   5 Past Participle   6 Comparative   7 Superlative   8 First Person   9 Second Person  10 Plural Past  11 Plural Possessive  12 Possessive  13 Future Tense  14 Plural Past Participle  15 Plural Present Participle  16 Plural Future Tense (17) Plural Third Person tense

-   -   Each other form has another form type which is stored in the         OFT_ID field in the DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORMS table. In some         embodiments, the facility uses other form types corresponding to         grammatical tenses defined at the phrase level, such as “plural         future,” which refers to a phrase where a noun or nouns are         pluralized and the verb is in the future tense. Such other form         types assist the facility in detecting phrases that all refer to         the same concept despite being phrased differently.     -   Other forms also have a word type which is stored in the WT_ID         field in the DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORMS table.

Referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_WORD_TYPES     -   DICTIONARY_OTHER_FORMS         acronyms (AC): This table stores acronyms.

Properties

Field description AC_id The unique identification number assigned to each acronym upon its creation. AC_name The name of the acronym connecting to the acronym id. AC_live_status Indicates whether the acronym is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live AC_deprecated_by The AC_id of the acronym record that supersedes a deprecated acronym record. Only used when an acronym is deprecated. AC_deprecation_notes The reason for deprecating an acronym such as, “Duplicate”, “Does not meet quality standards”, “Remapped”, etc. Only used when an acronym is deprecated. AC_date_added The date the acronym was created. AC_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. AC_language The language the content is in. AC_license_info The URL to license information for the owner of the content. Typically this is the UCF.

Table connecting to

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS_TO_ACRONYMS         dictionary_terms_to_acronyms (DI_to_AC): This table connects the         acronym table to dictionary_terms table.

Properties

Field description DI_to_AC_id The unique identification number assigned to each term name to acronym relationship upon its creation. DI_to_AC_live_status Indicates whether the term name to acronym relationship is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live. DI_to_AC_date_added The date the term name to acronym relationship was created. DI_to_AC_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. AC_id The id of the acronym connecting to the dictionary term name. DI_id The id of the dictionary term name connecting to the acronym.

Referenced by these tables:

-   -   ACRONYM     -   DICTIONARY_TERMS         blacklisted_linguistic_relationship_terms (BL): This table         contains list of terms that should be excluded from the         automatic parent/child relationships we suggest for the term         hierarchy mostly smaller common words like “a”, “the”, etc.

Properties

Field description BL_id The unique identification number assigned to each blacklisted linguistic relationship term upon its creation. BL_live_status Indicates whether the blacklisted linguistic relationship term is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live. BL_date_added The date the blacklisted linguistic relationship term was created. BL_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DI_id The id of the dictionary term name connecting to the blacklisted linguistic relationship term.

Referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS         dictionary_terms_same_level (DI_same_level): This table contains         synonyms and antonyms relationships between terms.     -   Properties

Field description DI_same_level_id The unique identification number assigned to terms same level relationship upon its creation. DI_same_level_live_status Indicates whether the terms same level relationship is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live. DI_same_level_date_added The date the terms same level relationship was created. DI_same_level_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DI_same_level_type Identifies whether the relationship is synonym or antonym: 1 = synonym, 2 = antonym. DI_id_1 The id term name of one of the terms in the relationship. DI_id_2 The id term name of one of the terms in the relationship.

referenced by these tables:

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS         dictionary_terms_hierarchy (DI_hierarchy): This table contains         relationships between terms.

Properties

Field description DI_hierarchy_id The unique identification number hierarchy relationship upon its creation. DI_hierarchy_live_status Indicates whether the hierarchy relationship is live or not. 1 = live, 0 = not live. DI_hierarchy_date_added The date the hierarchy relationship was created. DI_hierarchy_date_modified The date of the most recent edit to the record. DI_hierarchy_type Identifies the type of relationship: 3 = type of, 4 = part of, 5 = linguistic child of. DI_child The id of the child term name in the hierarchy relationship DI_parent_id The id of the parent term name in the hierarchy relationship.

-   -   Direction of relationship depends on which term is the parent         and which is the child.     -   example:     -   DI_HIERARCHY_TYPE: 3     -   DI_CHILD: Microsoft     -   DI_PARENT: software     -   Microsoft is a type of software and software is a category for         Microsoft.

Referenced by these Tables

-   -   DICTIONARY_TERMS

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above-described facility may be straightforwardly adapted or extended in various ways. While the foregoing description makes reference to particular embodiments, the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims that follow and the elements recited therein. 

We claim:
 1. A computer implemented method for identifying one or more definitions for a distinguished natural language term, the method comprising: identifying, by a computing system, among entries of a first table of an electronic database, each representing a natural language term, a first entry representing the distinguished natural language term; identifying, by the computing system, among entries of a second table of the electronic database, each representing a correspondence between a term and a definition defining the term, one or more second entries related to the first entry; for each particular second entry of the identified second entries, identifying, by the computing system, among entries of a third table of the electronic database, each representing a definition, a third entry related to the particular second entry, the third table being distinct from the second table; for each of the identified entries of the third table, accessing, by the computing system in the identified entry of the third table a natural language representation of the definition represented by the entry of the third table; and attributing, by the computing system writing to the electronic database, the accessed definition natural language representations to the distinguished natural language term.
 2. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: in relation to a distinguished one of the identified entries of the third table, identifying an entry of a fourth table corresponding to the distinguished entry of the third table, wherein the identified entry of the fourth table represents a word type corresponding to the definition represented in the distinguished entry of the third table, and wherein the word type specifies a part of speech for which a word is being used when it has the definition represented in the distinguished entry of the third table.
 3. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: identifying a fourth entry, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to both the first entry of the first table and a fifth entry of the first table, wherein the identified fourth entry defines a hierarchical relationship between the distinguished natural language term of the first entry and another natural language term of the fifth entry.
 4. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the identified fourth entry includes a field defining a type of the hierarchical relationship.
 5. The computer implemented method of claim 4, wherein the type of the hierarchical relationship corresponds to one of: the distinguished natural language term being a type of the other natural language term; the distinguished natural language term being part of the other natural language term; the distinguished natural language term being a linguistic child of the other natural language term; the distinguished natural language term being created by the other natural language term; or the distinguished natural language term being enforced by the other natural language term.
 6. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the identified fourth entry contains information indicating a source from which the hierarchical relationship defined in the identified fourth entry was derived.
 7. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising identifying one or more fourth entries, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to the first entry of the first table, wherein each identified fourth entry defines an alternate form of the distinguished natural language term.
 8. The computer implemented method of claim 7 further comprising, for each particular fourth entry of the identified fourth entries, identifying, from among entries of a fifth table, a corresponding entry representing a type of difference that the particular fourth entry represents as compared to the first entry.
 9. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising identifying one or more fourth entries, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to the first entry of the first table, wherein each identified fourth entry identifies a term that is a synonym or antonym of the distinguished natural language term.
 10. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising identifying one or more fourth entries, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to the first entry of the first table, wherein each identified fourth entry defines an acronym of the distinguished natural language term.
 11. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first table further includes a fourth entry representing another natural language term identified, through entries in the second and third tables, as having the same meaning as the distinguished natural language term; wherein the fourth entry is designated as being a harmonized term; and wherein, when the first table is accessed such that both the first and fourth entries are retrieved, the fourth entry is selected for preferred used due to the harmonized designation.
 12. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the identified third entries of the third table each relate to a control derived from an authority document.
 13. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: identifying, based on the attributed definition natural language representations, one or more relationships between the distinguished natural language term and one or more other natural language terms; and wherein the identified one or more relationships are used in mapping portions of a document to controls.
 14. A computer-readable storage medium, that is not a signal, storing data accessible by a program executable by a computing system, the computer-readable storage medium comprising: a dictionary data structure, wherein the dictionary data structure includes information usable by the program to identify one or more definitions for a distinguished natural language term, the dictionary data structure comprising: a first table comprising term entries, wherein each term entry represents a natural language term, and wherein a first entry of the term entries of the first table comprises a representation of the distinguished natural language term; a second table comprising correspondence entries, wherein each correspondence entry represents a correspondence between a term and a definition defining the term, and wherein one or more second entries of the correspondence entries are related to the first entry; and a third table comprising definition entries, wherein each definition entry represents a definition of a term, and wherein, for each particular second entry of the one or more second entries, the definition entries include a third entry related to the particular second entry, wherein the second entries are useable by the program to identify the third entries, and each particular third entry of the identified third entries is useable by the program to attribute a representation of the definition represented by the particular third entry to the distinguished natural language term.
 15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the dictionary data structure further comprises a fourth table with hierarchy entries, wherein each particular hierarchy entry corresponds to two of the term entries of the first table and defines a hierarchical relationship between the two natural language terms represented by the two term entries corresponding to the particular hierarchy entry, and wherein each particular hierarchy entry contains information indicating a source from which the hierarchical relationship defined in the particular hierarchy entry was derived.
 16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 wherein the dictionary data structure further comprises a fourth table with alternate form entries, wherein each alternate form entry corresponds to one of the term entries of the first table and defines an alternate form of the natural language term represented by the corresponding term entry, and wherein the dictionary data structure further comprises a fifth table with same level entries, wherein each same level entry corresponds to one of the term entries of the first table and identifies a term that is a synonym or antonym of the natural language term represented by the corresponding term entry.
 17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the third entries of the third table each relate to a control derived from an authority document.
 18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the program attributes the representations of the definitions represented by the third entries to the distinguished natural language term; wherein the program identifies, based on the attributed representations of the definitions, one or more relationships between the distinguished natural language term and one or more other natural language terms; and wherein the identified one or more relationships are used in mapping portions of a document to controls.
 19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the dictionary data structure is used by a computing system to augment a Part of Speech Tagger.
 20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the dictionary data structure is used by a computing system to augment a Named Entity Tagger.
 21. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the dictionary data structure is used by a computing system to augment a Natural Language Processor.
 22. A computing system for identifying one or more definitions for a distinguished natural language term, the computing system comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computing system to perform operations comprising: identifying, among entries of a first table each representing a natural language term, a first entry representing the distinguished natural language term; identifying, among entries of a second table each representing a correspondence between a term and a definition defining the term, one or more second entries related to the first entry; for each particular second entry of the identified second entries, identifying, among entries of a third table each representing a definition, a third entry related to the particular second entry, the third table being distinct from the second table; for each of the identified entries of the third table, accessing in the identified entry of the third table a natural language representation of the definition represented by the entry of the third table; and attributing the accessed definition natural language representations to the distinguished natural language term.
 23. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the operations further comprise: in relation to a distinguished one of the identified entries of the third table, identifying an entry of a fourth table corresponding to the distinguished entry of the third table, wherein the identified entry of the fourth table represents a word type corresponding to the definition represented in the distinguished entry of the third table, and wherein the word type specifies a part of speech for which a word is being used when it has the definition represented in the distinguished entry of the third table.
 24. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the operations further comprise: identifying a fourth entry, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to both the first entry of the first table and a fifth entry of the first table, wherein the identified fourth entry defines a hierarchical relationship between the distinguished natural language term of the first entry and another natural language term of the fifth entry.
 25. The computing system of claim 24, wherein the identified fourth entry includes a field defining a type of the hierarchical relationship.
 26. The computing system of claim 25, wherein the type of the hierarchical relationship corresponds to one of: the distinguished natural language term being a type of the other natural language term; the distinguished natural language term being part of the other natural language term; the distinguished natural language term being a linguistic child of the other natural language term; the distinguished natural language term being created by the other natural language term; or the distinguished natural language term being enforced by the other natural language term.
 27. The computing system of claim 24, wherein the identified fourth entry contains information indicating a source from which the hierarchical relationship defined in the identified fourth entry was derived.
 28. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the operations further comprise identifying one or more fourth entries, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to the first entry of the first table, wherein each identified fourth entry defines an alternate form of the distinguished natural language term.
 29. The computing system of claim 28, wherein the operations further comprise, for each particular fourth entry of the identified fourth entries, identifying, from among entries of a fifth table, a corresponding entry representing a type of difference that the particular fourth entry represents as compared to the first entry.
 30. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the operations further comprise identifying one or more fourth entries, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to the first entry of the first table, wherein each identified fourth entry identifies a term that is a synonym or antonym of the distinguished natural language term.
 31. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the operations further comprise identifying one or more fourth entries, from among entries of a fourth table, corresponding to the first entry of the first table, wherein each identified fourth entry defines an acronym of the distinguished natural language term.
 32. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the first table further includes a fourth entry representing another natural language term identified, through entries in the second and third tables, as having the same meaning as the distinguished natural language term; wherein the fourth entry is designated as being a harmonized term; and wherein, when the first table is accessed such that both the first and fourth entries are retrieved, the fourth entry is selected for preferred used due to the harmonized designation.
 33. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the identified third entries of the third table each relate to a control derived from an authority document.
 34. The computing system of claim 22, wherein the operations further comprise: identifying, based on the attributed definition natural language representations, one or more relationships between the distinguished natural language term and one or more other natural language terms; and wherein the identified one or more relationships are used in mapping portions of a document to controls. 